Question 2 on Carrol

What would a perfect artworld look like? Are all art pieces accepted or is the “failed art” simply cast aside and the more prestigious art is let in?

A perfect artworld, as I have talked about in previous posts is, of course, subjective. I believe the artworld should include all things art, literature, music, dance, etc., the failed and the successful. This war with the successful and failed art is something I feel necessary in the artworld, as well, as those artists and appreciators who do not understand the difference and find all art good as opposed to those who know good art from bad art. That constant war there helps create a balance and continuity for successful art. Every piece of art should be in the artworld because it is called the "artworld" hence and because the bad art serves as fuel for the successful artists to be even better.